Skip to main content

PMJAY: Average cost per treatment is 2.5 per cent of the sum assured

On 26th November, Dr Harsh Vardhan, Union Minister for Health and Family Welfare (MoHFW) tweeted that he held a meeting with the officials of the National Health Authority (NHA), the implementing body of Ayushman Bharat or Pradhan Mantri Jan Arogya Yojana (PMJAY) to review the progress of the scheme. PMJAY provides free health insurance coverage to over 50 crores or bottom 40 per cent of the country's population. The scheme guarantees health services for approximately 1300 medical conditions with the financial support of up to INR 5,00,000/- per family per year.

In his tweet, the minister also highlighted that, since its launch in September 2018, the scheme has provided over 1.4 crore cashless treatments worth INR 17,500/- crore to the poorest citizens. A visit to the official website of PMJAY (https://pmjay.gov.in) on 3rd December shows that till date, total admissions under the scheme have been 1,43,66,465. It also shows that claims raised were INR7,564 crore (almost INR10,000 crore less than what the minister tweeted).

Assuming the financial numbers tweeted by the MoHFW is the latest updated figure, a simple back of the envelope calculation shows that the average cost of treatment or the money spent is only INR12,500/- per admitted patient.

Number of Admitted Patients

1.4 Cr

Total Cost of Treatment (Cashless)

Rs. 17,500 Cr

Cost per Treatment (Total Cost / No. of Patients)

Rs. 12,500

If this is the average cost of treatment in the two years since the launch of the scheme and after over one per cent of the population receiving the medical assistance, the question is does the scheme need a maximum coverage of INR5,00,000 per family per year? A study by Shankar Prinja et. al (Designing a Framework for Benefit Packages - Achieving Universal Health Coverage in India) shows that a cover of up to INR3,00,000 will essentially cover 100 per cent of the conditions in the deprived families in rural areas. If an insurance cover of INR3,00,000 is able to eliminate impoverishment, then it is worthwhile to ponder whether we need to provide a benefit cover as high as INR5,00,000?

In addition, studies have also shown that having health insurance has led to excess/unnecessary consumption of medical services leading to issues of moral hazard, both by the provider and receiver of such services. Higher benefit packages may be an incentive for empanelled hospitals, especially private facilities for over prescription and overdiagnosis and consumption of health services. In the absence of a strong regulatory mechanism, the threat of moral hazard looms large, especially since PMJAY is a cashless scheme.

Another important area of concern should be the premiums to be paid to insurance companies for providing the desired cover. Some estimates basis the experiences of the successful implementation of state-run schemes suggest that the premiums to be paid for a scheme like PMJAY will not be less than INR3,000 per household. In a scenario where the average cost of treatment is INR12,500, why pay such hefty premiums and drain the exchequer and allow profiteering by private companies?

As much as PMJAY is important in meeting the healthcare financing needs of the population, a better design will help it achieve efficiency and maybe even allow the government to provide a much-needed shield to many more citizens of the country without draining the exchequer.

Comments

  1. Sudarshan4 December 2020 at 12:22

    Excellent analysis that throws in a great perspective. Very insightful.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Tapish4 December 2020 at 13:56

    Such lucid writing emphasising a critical argument. Well done

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

State of Women’s Health in India

The fifth National Family Health Survey 2019-21 (NFHS-5) conducted by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India, provides extensive insights on population, health and nutrition at the country and state/union territory level and even the estimates at the district level. The survey touches on over 130 parameters across 21 sub-categories, with some specific to women and children and others aimed at a broader population. It also provides a comparison of the performance of the urban and rural population. For the first time, the sex ratio of the total population (females per 1,000 males) crossed the four-figure mark. It stood at 1,020 females per 1,000 males vis-à-vis 991 in NFHS-4 conducted in 2015-16. This is a significant achievement and success of the government measures against the practice of female infanticide. A major contribution towards this achievement is the enactment of Pre-Natal Diagnostic Technique (PNDT) Act, 1994, which prohibits sex selection and the mi...
1 comment
Read more

Mind the Gap

The Constitution of India states that it is the “ duty of the State to raise the level of nutrition and standard of living and to improve public health ” (Government of India, 1950) . However, for the past decade, the public health expenditure in India continues to hover around one per cent of the gross domestic product (GDP) (MoHFW, 2019) . According to the World Bank, India is a Lower Middle-Income country, but its spending on healthcare is even less than the countries in the Lower Income Group. Since government financing is a function of the taxes that it raises, countries with a higher tax to GDP ratio tends to have better-financed healthcare systems. Low and middle-income countries with not so robust tax to GDP ratio finds it difficult to meet the demand for financing the healthcare of its citizens completely. With a tax to GDP ratio falling to a decade low of 9.88 per cent in FY20 (Seth, 2020) , naturally, public financing in India is insufficient to meet the healthcare require...
4 comments
Read more

PMJAY Revisited: The Cost of Treatment That Inflation Forgot

Replying to a question in the Rajya Sabha on 28 July 2026, the Minister of State for Health and Family Welfare, Prataprao Jadhav, informed Parliament that over 447.3 million Ayushman cards have now been generated under the Ayushman Bharat – Pradhan Mantri Jan Arogya Yojana (PMJAY), and that as of 30 June 2026, the scheme had authorised 126.9 million hospital admissions worth INR 1,920 billion. A post on this blog in December 2020 ( PMJAY: Average cost per treatment is 2.5 per cent of the sum assured ) ran a simple back-of-the-envelope calculation. At that time, the scheme had recorded about 14 million admissions worth INR 175 billion, averaging INR 12,500 per admitted patient. The question raised then was whether a scheme whose average claim was this modest really needed a headline cover of up to INR 500,000 per family per year. Five and a half years on, the same arithmetic is worth repeating. The average cost of treatment has increased from INR 12,500 to INR 15,130. On the face of it,...
Post a Comment
Read more