Skip to main content

Should India Adopt A One Child Policy? Data Suggests Otherwise.

As of 2019, the population of India was approximately 1.37 billion, bringing it closer to the most populous nation, China which had a population of 1.43 billion (ourworldindata.org). By 2027, India is expected to overtake China to become the most populous country on this planet with an estimated population of 1.47 billion. While China’s population is expected to start declining later this decade, it is estimated that the population of India will continue to grow and reach a peak of 1.7 billion in the late 2050s before starting to decline. Between now and 2060, India is expected to add over 400 million people.

Looking at the staggering population numbers, every now and then there are discussions papers, demand from political parties among other to introduce measures to curb the population growth. There are good arguments both in favour and against policy decisions like One Child Policy. Basis the recently released report by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (MoHFW) — Health and Family Welfare Statistics 2019–20 (https://main.mohfw.gov.in/sites/default/files/HealthandFamilyWelfarestatisticsinIndia201920.pdf), I am of the opinion that we may not need such policy measures. Two main reasons to support the argument:

First, India is already on the verge of witnessing its Total Fertility Rate (TFR) at the national level falling below the replacement rate. The TFR of India as of 2017 was 2.2. A TFR of 2.1 and above is considered a replacement rate. The TFR rate which was 2.8 in 2006, has been falling constantly. If we break the data into Urban and Rural, the Urban TFR has been below the replacement rate since 2006 and has been continuously falling. Even the Rural TFR has witnessed a decline from 3.1 in 2006 to 2.4 as of 2017. With India likely to see migration to Urban areas in the coming decades, this boasts well for the policy planners.

In addition, if we look at the data at the state level, among the major states, Bihar has the highest TFR of 3.2, closely followed by UP-3.0, MP-2.7, Rajasthan-2.6, Jharkhand-2.5, Chattisgarh-2.4 and Assam-2.3 are the seven states which have a TFR higher than the national average whereas Gujarat and Haryana are at par with the national average. Apart from these, the other states are well below the national as well as replacement rate.

Source: Health and Family Welfare Statistics, 2019-20.

Second, since the implementation of laws and regulations has always been an Achilles’ heel for India, the policy planners and lawmakers should control their urge to implement a national policy to such an effect. Moreover, in 12 of the 22 states mentioned above, the TFR is already below the replacement rate; hence it doesn’t make sense to introduce a national policy on population control.

It’s the erstwhile BIMARU states (Bihar, Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan and Uttar Pradesh) along with the newly formed Chhattisgarh and Jharkhand (carved out from Madhya Pradesh and Bihar, respectively) which are not only the leading seven states on the basis of TFR but also amongst the most populous states in the country. The combined population of these seven states along with Haryana and Gujarat is over 700 million or over 50 per cent of the country’s population.

While the combined population of these states is huge and will have a substantial impact on the population outcomes of the nation as a whole, but instead of a national level policy, state-specific policy interventions will address the challenges better. It will also help in saving valuable resources (money, manpower, time, distraction from other key issues, political slugfest) both in states which do not need to enact/implement such policy measures as well as at the national level.

Hence, India should not look at implementing a one-child policy and rather should just focus on education and awareness regarding population control through its ongoing family planning programme.

As Ruchir Sharma, the Head of Emerging Markets — Morgan Stanley writes in his book (10 Rules of Successful Nation) that successful nations will fight population decline. We are witnessing the economic decline of most of the EU countries, Japan, among others as their populations continue to fall. As India strives to fulfil the dream of a quality of life to its billion-plus population in the present and plan to maintain an economic growth fueled by a large population well into the future, it’s not only a tight rope walk, but also a double-edged sword.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

State of Women’s Health in India

The fifth National Family Health Survey 2019-21 (NFHS-5) conducted by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India, provides extensive insights on population, health and nutrition at the country and state/union territory level and even the estimates at the district level. The survey touches on over 130 parameters across 21 sub-categories, with some specific to women and children and others aimed at a broader population. It also provides a comparison of the performance of the urban and rural population. For the first time, the sex ratio of the total population (females per 1,000 males) crossed the four-figure mark. It stood at 1,020 females per 1,000 males vis-à-vis 991 in NFHS-4 conducted in 2015-16. This is a significant achievement and success of the government measures against the practice of female infanticide. A major contribution towards this achievement is the enactment of Pre-Natal Diagnostic Technique (PNDT) Act, 1994, which prohibits sex selection and the mi...
1 comment
Read more

Mind the Gap

The Constitution of India states that it is the “ duty of the State to raise the level of nutrition and standard of living and to improve public health ” (Government of India, 1950) . However, for the past decade, the public health expenditure in India continues to hover around one per cent of the gross domestic product (GDP) (MoHFW, 2019) . According to the World Bank, India is a Lower Middle-Income country, but its spending on healthcare is even less than the countries in the Lower Income Group. Since government financing is a function of the taxes that it raises, countries with a higher tax to GDP ratio tends to have better-financed healthcare systems. Low and middle-income countries with not so robust tax to GDP ratio finds it difficult to meet the demand for financing the healthcare of its citizens completely. With a tax to GDP ratio falling to a decade low of 9.88 per cent in FY20 (Seth, 2020) , naturally, public financing in India is insufficient to meet the healthcare require...
4 comments
Read more

PMJAY Revisited: The Cost of Treatment That Inflation Forgot

Replying to a question in the Rajya Sabha on 28 July 2026, the Minister of State for Health and Family Welfare, Prataprao Jadhav, informed Parliament that over 447.3 million Ayushman cards have now been generated under the Ayushman Bharat – Pradhan Mantri Jan Arogya Yojana (PMJAY), and that as of 30 June 2026, the scheme had authorised 126.9 million hospital admissions worth INR 1,920 billion. A post on this blog in December 2020 ( PMJAY: Average cost per treatment is 2.5 per cent of the sum assured ) ran a simple back-of-the-envelope calculation. At that time, the scheme had recorded about 14 million admissions worth INR 175 billion, averaging INR 12,500 per admitted patient. The question raised then was whether a scheme whose average claim was this modest really needed a headline cover of up to INR 500,000 per family per year. Five and a half years on, the same arithmetic is worth repeating. The average cost of treatment has increased from INR 12,500 to INR 15,130. On the face of it,...
Post a Comment
Read more