As of 2019, the population of India was approximately 1.37
billion, bringing it closer to the most populous nation, China which had a
population of 1.43 billion (ourworldindata.org).
By 2027, India is expected to overtake China to become the most populous
country on this planet with an estimated population of 1.47 billion. While
China’s population is expected to start declining later this decade, it is
estimated that the population of India will continue to grow and reach a peak
of 1.7 billion in the late 2050s before starting to decline. Between now and
2060, India is expected to add over 400 million people.
Looking at the staggering population numbers, every now and then
there are discussions papers, demand from political parties among other to
introduce measures to curb the population growth. There are good arguments both
in favour and against policy decisions like One Child Policy. Basis the
recently released report by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare
(MoHFW) — Health and Family Welfare Statistics 2019–20 (https://main.mohfw.gov.in/sites/default/files/HealthandFamilyWelfarestatisticsinIndia201920.pdf),
I am of the opinion that we may not need such policy measures. Two main reasons
to support the argument:
First, India is already on the verge of witnessing its Total
Fertility Rate (TFR) at the national level falling below the replacement rate.
The TFR of India as of 2017 was 2.2. A TFR of 2.1 and above is considered a
replacement rate. The TFR rate which was 2.8 in 2006, has been falling
constantly. If we break the data into Urban and Rural, the Urban TFR has been
below the replacement rate since 2006 and has been continuously falling. Even
the Rural TFR has witnessed a decline from 3.1 in 2006 to 2.4 as of 2017. With
India likely to see migration to Urban areas in the coming decades, this boasts
well for the policy planners.
In addition, if we look at the data at the state level, among the
major states, Bihar has the highest TFR of 3.2, closely followed by UP-3.0,
MP-2.7, Rajasthan-2.6, Jharkhand-2.5, Chattisgarh-2.4 and Assam-2.3 are the
seven states which have a TFR higher than the national average whereas Gujarat
and Haryana are at par with the national average. Apart from these, the other
states are well below the national as well as replacement rate.
Second, since the implementation of laws and regulations has
always been an Achilles’ heel for India, the policy planners and lawmakers
should control their urge to implement a national policy to such an effect.
Moreover, in 12 of the 22 states mentioned above, the TFR is already below the
replacement rate; hence it doesn’t make sense to introduce a national policy on
population control.
It’s the erstwhile BIMARU states (Bihar, Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan
and Uttar Pradesh) along with the newly formed Chhattisgarh and Jharkhand
(carved out from Madhya Pradesh and Bihar, respectively) which are not only the
leading seven states on the basis of TFR but also amongst the most populous
states in the country. The combined population of these seven states along with
Haryana and Gujarat is over 700 million or over 50 per cent of the country’s
population.
While the combined population of these states is huge and will
have a substantial impact on the population outcomes of the nation as a whole,
but instead of a national level policy, state-specific policy interventions
will address the challenges better. It will also help in saving valuable
resources (money, manpower, time, distraction from other key issues, political
slugfest) both in states which do not need to enact/implement such policy
measures as well as at the national level.
Hence, India should not look at implementing a one-child policy
and rather should just focus on education and awareness regarding population
control through its ongoing family planning programme.
As Ruchir Sharma, the Head of Emerging Markets — Morgan Stanley
writes in his book (10 Rules of Successful Nation) that successful nations will
fight population decline. We are witnessing the economic decline of most of the
EU countries, Japan, among
others as their populations continue to fall. As
India strives to fulfil the dream of a quality of life to its billion-plus
population in the present and plan to maintain an economic growth fueled by a
large population well into the future, it’s not only a tight rope walk, but
also a double-edged sword.
Comments
Post a Comment