Skip to main content

Rajasthan leads the way in UHC

Amidst all the gloom and doom news of Covid-19 wave raging across the country and people gasping for oxygen, here is a breadth of fresh air. Rajasthan, the desert state in the western part of the country launched a Universal Health Coverage (UHC) scheme for all residents of the state. Announced in the budget speech for FY22 presented by chief minister Ashok Gehlot, who also holds the Finance portfolio, the state will offer cashless medical insurance of up to Rs.5,00,000/- to all families in the state. According to estimates, the population of Rajasthan is little over eight crores. The state has allocated Rs.3,500/- crores for the Mukhyamantri Chirajeevi Yojana, the official name of the scheme.

The scheme comes into effect from 1st May 2021 and the following categories are eligible by default: Socio Economic Class Census (SECC) 2011 Registered families, National Food Security Act (NFSA) Card Holders, Small/Marginal Farmers, Contractual Workers. The scheme is completely free of cost to all the above categories. Whereas, the families, which are outside these categories can register themselves on the health ministry portal to be eligible for the health cover by paying an annual premium of Rs.850 and a one-time registration fee of Rs20. A comparison of the annual premiums for policy coverage of up to Rs.5,00,000/- for an individual alone on policybazaar.com shows that even for basic policies, the minimum premium is Rs.4,000/- plus. Moreover, these policies cover far less than what is proposed under Chiranjeevi Yojana. Thus, making it financially very attractive for families to sign-up for the scheme.

The Chiranjeevi Yojana will cover 1576 pre-defined medical conditions and Covid-19 care too. Unlike most of the health insurance schemes, which only cover in-patient expenses, the Chiranjeevi Yojana will also cover Out of Pocket Expenses (OOPE) on medical/diagnostic tests, other medical expenses and will also offer a related package of up to 15 days after getting discharged from the hospital. This move is like to significantly reduce the OOPE burden on families, which itself amounted to over 60 per cent of the total health care expenses and pushes millions of families below the poverty line, each year.

While the design of the scheme is grand and the policy thinking is in the right direction, the biggest challenge emanates from the limited medical infrastructure to support such initiatives. The execution will be the key. In addition, enough studies have in the past raised concerns over the excess/unnecessary consumption of medical services because of the availability of a financial cover paid by a third party. The challenge maybe even bigger as the scheme is cashless and there is very little incentive to keep the cost down, both for the patient and the caregiver. Nonetheless, the scheme will be closely watched not only in the state of Rajasthan but by other states and the Union government too for lessons on its success and challenges in replicating the model across the country. Until such a time, wishing that the residents of the state remain in the pink of their health.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

State of Women’s Health in India

The fifth National Family Health Survey 2019-21 (NFHS-5) conducted by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India, provides extensive insights on population, health and nutrition at the country and state/union territory level and even the estimates at the district level. The survey touches on over 130 parameters across 21 sub-categories, with some specific to women and children and others aimed at a broader population. It also provides a comparison of the performance of the urban and rural population. For the first time, the sex ratio of the total population (females per 1,000 males) crossed the four-figure mark. It stood at 1,020 females per 1,000 males vis-à-vis 991 in NFHS-4 conducted in 2015-16. This is a significant achievement and success of the government measures against the practice of female infanticide. A major contribution towards this achievement is the enactment of Pre-Natal Diagnostic Technique (PNDT) Act, 1994, which prohibits sex selection and the mi...

Mind the Gap

The Constitution of India states that it is the “ duty of the State to raise the level of nutrition and standard of living and to improve public health ” (Government of India, 1950) . However, for the past decade, the public health expenditure in India continues to hover around one per cent of the gross domestic product (GDP) (MoHFW, 2019) . According to the World Bank, India is a Lower Middle-Income country, but its spending on healthcare is even less than the countries in the Lower Income Group. Since government financing is a function of the taxes that it raises, countries with a higher tax to GDP ratio tends to have better-financed healthcare systems. Low and middle-income countries with not so robust tax to GDP ratio finds it difficult to meet the demand for financing the healthcare of its citizens completely. With a tax to GDP ratio falling to a decade low of 9.88 per cent in FY20 (Seth, 2020) , naturally, public financing in India is insufficient to meet the healthcare require...

PMJAY Revisited: The Cost of Treatment That Inflation Forgot

Replying to a question in the Rajya Sabha on 28 July 2026, the Minister of State for Health and Family Welfare, Prataprao Jadhav, informed Parliament that over 447.3 million Ayushman cards have now been generated under the Ayushman Bharat – Pradhan Mantri Jan Arogya Yojana (PMJAY), and that as of 30 June 2026, the scheme had authorised 126.9 million hospital admissions worth INR 1,920 billion. A post on this blog in December 2020 ( PMJAY: Average cost per treatment is 2.5 per cent of the sum assured ) ran a simple back-of-the-envelope calculation. At that time, the scheme had recorded about 14 million admissions worth INR 175 billion, averaging INR 12,500 per admitted patient. The question raised then was whether a scheme whose average claim was this modest really needed a headline cover of up to INR 500,000 per family per year. Five and a half years on, the same arithmetic is worth repeating. The average cost of treatment has increased from INR 12,500 to INR 15,130. On the face of it,...